Upending the Industry Release Logic
Jaws also changed how movies are released, in a literal sense. The film opened in more than 400 theaters, making it an unusually wide release at the time—though not, contrary to popular belief, the first film with a so-called saturation release. In 1974, McBride notes, The Trial of Billy Jack opened in more than 1,000 theaters during its opening week, despite or perhaps because it was critically panned.
“The attitude previously was, if you had a very wide opening, it meant it wasn’t a very good film and they were trying to get their money quickly before the word of mouth spread,” says McBride, author of Steven Spielberg: A Biography. “If you had a quality film, they would open it in a few theaters in major cities and then gradually expand it. They’d open films in New York and L.A. and Chicago and let the word get around.”
Jaws overhauled that mentality, revealing the logic of a massive first-week release accompanied by heavy national advertising (and, crucially, positive word of mouth). “A lot of people claim that Spielberg and Lucas ruined Hollywood, which I think is simplistic,” McBride says. “Because those films did cause the blockbuster phenomenon to become dominant.”
In McBride’s view, what actually ruined Hollywood was the television advertising that accompanied these gargantuan releases. “When you have a 30-second spot to sell a film, it becomes very simplistic. And then they had to design films so they could be described in a 30-second spot.”
Film fans frustrated by the endless scourge of sequels, prequels and reboots filling up the multiplexes today and crowding out more original, character-driven films may be tempted to blame Jaws for the world it wrought. In his 1990 essay “Blockbuster: The Last Crusade,” film historian Peter Biskind argued that Spielberg and Lucas were responsible for “obliterat[ing] years of sophisticated, adult moviegoing habits” and reducing “an entire culture to childishness”; studios, in turn, fell in thrall to “the Roman-numeral movie, product of the obsession with surefire hits.”
Did you know? The animatronic shark in 'Jaws,' designed to look like a great white, was notoriously unreliable and prone to breaking down in the saltwater environment. Crew members nicknamed the creature "Bruce" after Spielberg's lawyer, Bruce Ramer.
Creature Feature, Upgraded
Before becoming a classic, Jaws itself initially earned mixed reviews, with critics focusing praise on its strong characterizations and performances. And its soundtrack and suspenseful editing won awards. As it turns out, the filming of Jaws had traumatized Spielberg—the mechanical shark rarely worked, and the nightmarish production ran 100 days over schedule. But the director used those technical limitations to his advantage, rendering the shark a sensed but unseen menace with Hitchcockian flair. It felt, in his words, “almost like I’m directing the audience with an electric cattle prod,” and the approach worked. The film’s success anointed him a figurehead of the New Hollywood movement and a millionaire before age 30; its savvy direction blurred lines between lowbrow “creature feature” and psychological drama.
“It’s so much more than just a thriller,” says filmmaker and author Laurent Bouzereau, director of the documentary Jaws @ 50: The Definitive Inside Story. “It feels like a horror movie at times, and at times it’s a drama about three men being tested to their limits, and they each represent a very specific archetypal figure. Some of the most riveting scenes in the film have nothing to do with the shark.”
Fifty years after its release, what stands out about Jaws is how Spielberg took a template for a generic creature feature and made it into a gripping thriller about primal fears, small-town corruption and an eternal battle between man and beast. In other words, “it went from being a potential B-movie to being an A+ movie,” Bouzereau says.